A while back, [brenda lee noted] that “Since sending [Stacee Skye] outside in progressively feminine attire seems to be a punishment for her, I would say that every added step would make her more and more uncomfortable.” Yes, that is the idea.
She then goes on to write, “Being fully dressed might be less distressing than being partially dressed. What you are doing to [Stacee Skye], dressing her, and sending her out in public with such large breasts is bound to attract attention. Maybe if they were smaller she’d be much more “˜passable’, but you’ve made it impossible for her not to attract attention….” where she completely misses the boat.
I am sure that going out fully dressed would be less stressful than the partial dress that she has been subjected to, but the point is not to send her out and make her passable, but to send her out so she has the possibility of being publicly humiliated. Mistress M took [Stacee Skye] out clothes shopping a while back at the thrift store with her underwear, hose, corset and cuffs locked on (though no breast forms). I was excited when Mistress told me that she had considered have [Stacee Skye] try on clothes in the store, and disappointed when she told me that had left without doing so.
The image of [Stacee Skye] opening the dressing room door, with her cuffs peeking out from a skirt, facing the public as Mistress M dressed her down for her horrible fashion sense would have made my day. Perhaps they will go shopping again one (humiliating) day.
[Stacee Skye]: http://institute.cdpunishment.com/profiles/stacee_skye
The name here is Institute for Cross-Dressing Punishment. That punishment can take on many forms including public outing.